January 9, 2011  |   
                                               
                                                                        
                                                                                                                              Is Jared Lee Loughner, the alleged mass murderer who shot U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords of Arizona, a right-wing extremist?
 It’s hard to say. When you look at the Internet material he   purportedly produced, the first impression you get is that the   22-year-old now in custody for the shooting of 19 people in Tucson was   completely out of his mind, or at least mildly deranged. His writings   will be virtually impossible for most people to understand, what with   his references to unexplained numbers, his fondness for weird   syllogisms, his unexplained references and his apparent semi-literacy.
 That said, there are some clues.
 At one point, Loughner refers disparagingly to “currency that’s not   backed by gold or silver.” The idea that silver and gold are the only   “constitutional” money is widespread in the antigovernment “Patriot”   movement that produced so much violence in the 1990s. It’s linked to the   core Patriot theory that the Federal Reserve is actually a private   corporation run for the benefit of unnamed international bankers.   So-called Patriots say paper money — what they refer to with a sneer as   “Federal Reserve notes” — is not lawful.
 At another, Loughner makes extraordinarily obscure comments about   language and grammar, suggesting that the government engages in “mind   control on the people by controlling grammar.” That’s not the kind of   idea that’s very common out there, even on the Internet. In fact, I   think it’s pretty clear that Loughner is taking ideas from Patriot   conspiracy theorist David Wynn Miller   of Milwaukee. Miller claims that the government uses grammar to   “enslave” Americans and offers up his truly weird “Truth-language” as an   antidote. For example, he says that if you add colons and hyphens to   your name in a certain way, you are no longer taxable. Miller may be mad   as a hatter, but he has a real following on the right.
 Loughner talks about how you “can’t trust the government” and someone   burns a U.S. flag in one of his videos. Although certain right-wing   websites are already using that (and his listing of The Communist Manifesto   as one of his favorite books) to claim that Loughner was a   “left-winger,” that does not strike me as true. The main enemy of the   Patriot movement is certainly the federal government. And so-called   Patriots have certainly engaged in acts like burning the flag.
 Finally, I think Loughner’s reading list, although it included   children’s books and a few classics, had an underlying theme — the   individual versus the totalitarian state. Certainly, that’s the explicit   central theme of Ayn Rand’s We the Living and Orwell’s 1984 and Animal Farm, among others.  I would argue that that’s the way Loughlin seems to be reading The Communist Manifesto and Hitler’s Mein Kampf — as variants of a kind of generalized “smash the state” attitude.
 Chip Berlet of Political Research Associates, which does similar work to that of Hatewatch, points out in a post earlier today   that Loughner also makes a reference to a “second American   constitution.” As Chip notes, that is commonly understood to refer to   the Reconstruction amendments that freed the slaves and gave them   citizenship, among other things. Chip says that “raises the question of a   possible racist and anti-immigrant tie” in the Arizona shooting.
 On top of that, Fox News is reporting on an internal Department of   Homeland Security message suggesting some tie between Loughner and American Renaissance, a kind of white-collar racist group.
 I can’t speak to those allegations. Outside of what Chip pointed out,   I didn’t see anything that suggested racial, anti-Semitic or   anti-immigrant animus in Loughner’s writings. Certainly, there’s nothing   I saw at all reminiscent of American Renaissance, which focuses  heavily  on the alleged intellectual and psychological inferiority of  black  people.
 At this early stage, I think Loughner is probably best described as a   mentally ill or unstable person who was influenced by the rhetoric and   demonizing propaganda around him. Ideology may not explain why he   allegedly killed, but it could help explain how he selected his target.
 One thing that seems clear is that Giffords, who was terribly wounded   but survived, was the nearest and most obvious representative of “the   government” that Loughner could find. Another is that he likely  absorbed  some of his anger from the vitriolic political atmosphere in  the United  States in general and Arizona in particular. Perhaps no one  made that  point better than Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik,  speaking to a  press conference yesterday. “When you look at unbalanced  people, how  they respond to the vitriol that comes out of certain  mouths about  tearing down the government… The anger, the hatred, the  bigotry that  goes on in this country is getting to be outrageous and  unfortunately  Arizona has become sort of the capital. We have become  the mecca for  prejudice and bigotry.”
Mark Potok is the editor of the 
Southern Poverty Law Center's 
Intelligence Report.
                                                             
No comments:
Post a Comment